- Pay transparency and what it means for modern startups
- What are pay transparency laws?
- Salary history bans vs. pay transparency
- Why pay transparency is a competitive advantage
- Pay transparency laws by state and city
- U.S. pay transparency laws (as of April 2026)
- How companies can prepare for pay transparency changes
- Salary bands and levels
- Compensation philosophy and plan
- Common pay transparency pitfalls
- Tools for a transparent compensation
- Frequently asked questions about pay transparency
- How does pay transparency apply to contractors and advisors?
- How do you manage pay transparency for a remote team?
- Does pay transparency mean sharing everyone’s exact salary?
- Do pay transparency laws apply to bonuses and equity?
- Do these laws apply to internal promotions or transfers?
- What is a "good faith" salary range?
- What are the penalties under pay transparency laws?
New pay transparency laws in several parts of the country require (or will soon require) employers to publish a salary or hourly wage range in their job postings. Policymakers believe the up-front disclosure adds a new fairness measure for employees. If companies approach it correctly, it also presents an opportunity for them: It makes the hiring process far more efficient.
What are pay transparency laws?
Pay transparency laws are regulations that require employers to disclose salary or wage ranges for job roles. This set of legislation aims to promote pay transparency by giving candidates and employees access to compensation information. The central goal is to help close persistent wage gaps, which can be difficult to address because, as the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) notes, pay discrimination is often hidden from view. These pay disparities can be stark: According to Carta's 2024 Annual Equity Report, women received 22.5% of all new equity issued on Carta, despite making up 35% of new equity-receiving hires.
For a startup founder, these laws represent a fundamental shift in how you hire and create a compensation plan for your team. While it can feel like another compliance task, embracing wage transparency is an effective way to build trust. In fact, contrary to old advice, research on pay transparency covering over 1,300 firms shows it can be the right choice for improving employee satisfaction with their compensation. It signals that you are a professional, fair, and modern employer, which is a significant advantage when competing for top talent and employee retention.
Adopting transparency early also helps you build a strong company culture rooted in fair pay. When compensation is clear and based on a compensation philosophy, it reduces the potential for internal friction and shows your team that you value every member's contribution. Closing this gap by educating employees about their compensation builds a foundation of trust that is invaluable as you scale your company.
This means clearly communicating not just the salary for a role, but the "how" and "why" behind every component of your total rewards, including salary bands, variable compensation, and especially equity. This approach creates a clear, consistent framework that shows your team the system is fair.
Salary history bans vs. pay transparency
While navigating pay transparency, you will likely encounter another set of rules known as salary history bans. Though related, these two types of laws address different aspects of the hiring process. It's important for you to understand the distinction between them.
Salary history bans look to the past by prohibiting employers from asking candidates about their prior compensation. The purpose is to break the cycle of underpayment, where a candidate's future salary is anchored to a potentially unfair previous salary, making it hard to value a job offer.
Pay transparency laws, on the other hand, look to the future by requiring employers to disclose what a role is expected to pay. Both work toward the same goal of establishing fairer compensation based on the role's value to the company, not a candidate's past earnings.
Why pay transparency is a competitive advantage
For a growing startup, pay transparency is a strategic tool for growth. In a competitive hiring market where you may not always be able to offer the highest cash salary, clarity becomes a powerful advantage. It allows you to build a foundation of trust with your team, investors, and future hires from day one.
Aligning expectations for compensation helps job candidates as well as employers. In the short term, neither side will be wasting their time conducting interviews and negotiations if their pay expectations are misaligned. Over the long term, it can protect against low morale and attrition by helping make sure that employees are paid similarly to their peers.
Other benefits of pay transparency include:
Builds investor trust: A clear compensation plan demonstrates to investors that you are organized, professional, and thinking strategically about your two biggest expenses: payroll and equity.
Attracts top talent: When you can't always compete on cash alone, a transparent offer of equity can be the deciding factor. Showing a candidate their potential ownership stake and its future value makes the opportunity feel more tangible and compelling, helping you win hires you might otherwise lose.
Fosters a culture of fairness: Pay transparency prevents the internal tension and pay inequities that arise when compensation is negotiated on a case-by-case basis. A consistent framework ensures that as your team grows, morale remains high because everyone understands the system is equitable.
A company’s approach to pay transparency can also guard against claims of pay discrimination. Even at companies that do their best to comply with laws against discrimination, unintentional biases in the hiring process can generate unequal outcomes. A growing body of research shows that one reason for these disparate outcomes is that women are less likely to benefit from the traditional negotiation process. Racial biases may have similar effects for people of color. Limiting negotiations to a published range reduces the opportunity for unequal outcomes.
These disparities are often measurable on a national scale—in 2024, women who were full-time wage and salary workers had median weekly earnings of $1,083—83.2% of the $1,302 median for men. Pay transparency helps address these existing equity gaps by making compensation structures and philosophies clear.

Pay transparency laws by state and city
The legal landscape around pay transparency is evolving quickly. By making wage and salary ranges more transparent, lawmakers believe they can make recruiting and hiring more efficient—and make compensation fairer. A fixed salary range helps candidates make informed decisions about what open positions they’ll pursue and how they’ll negotiate an offer. It also helps make sure that employers fit the salary range to the role—not to the more subjective (and often biased) process that unfolds during the interview process.
U.S. pay transparency laws (as of April 2026)
Sixteen states and Washington, D.C. have enacted laws. No federal law is currently in effect.
Jurisdiction | Effective date | Key requirements | Who it applies to |
Jan 1, 2023; updated Jan 1, 2026 | Must include pay scale (good-faith expected range at hire) in all job postings. Must provide pay scale to job applicants and current employees upon request. Penalties: $100–$10,000 per violation. | Employers with 15+ employees for job postings; all employers for on-request disclosures; 100+ for pay data reporting | |
Jan 1, 2021 | Must include pay range, benefits, and other compensation in all job postings. | All employers with at least 1 employee in CO; remote-only employers with <15 CO employees have phased requirements until Jul 1, 2029 | |
Oct 1, 2021 | Must disclose wage range to applicants upon request, or before/at time a compensation offer is made (whichever is earlier). Must disclose wage range to employees at time of hire and upon any position change. Salary history inquiry banned. Private right of action for violations. | All employers with 1+ employees in CT | |
Jun 30, 2024 | Must include minimum and maximum salary or hourly pay in all job postings. Must inform applicants of available health care benefits before the first interview. Must post workplace notice about the law. Penalties: $1,000–$20,000 per violation. Does not apply to D.C. or federal government employers. | All employers with 1+ employees in D.C. (excludes D.C. and federal government) | |
Jan 1, 2024 | Must include hourly rate or salary range in all external job postings. Must provide written notice to new hires of rate of pay, pay schedule, and place of payment. Must notify employees of changes to pay rate or schedule in advance. Does not apply to internal transfers or promotions or public employees whose pay is set by collective bargaining. | Public and private employers with 50+ employees | |
Jan 1, 2025 | Must disclose pay scale and benefits in all job postings for positions performed partly or wholly in IL, or reporting to an IL supervisor or worksite. All employers (regardless of size) must disclose pay info on request before any offer or discussion of compensation. Must announce internal job opportunities to all current employees. Salary history inquiry banned. | Employers with 15+ employees for posting requirements; all employers for on-request disclosures | |
Oct 1, 2024 | Must disclose wage range and a general description of benefits and other compensation in all job postings. Applies to positions performed at least in part inside Maryland. Must provide wage range to applicants and employees upon request. | All employers in Maryland (no minimum employee threshold) | |
Oct 29, 2025 | Must disclose pay range in all job postings (internal and external). Must provide a pay range to employees offered a promotion or internal transfer. Must provide pay range to applicants and employees upon request. Applies to remote positions performed within MA and out-of-state workers whose primary workplace is in MA. Active enforcement/audits underway in 2026. | Employers with 25+ employees whose primary place of work is in MA (includes full-time, part-time, seasonal, and temporary) | |
Jan 1, 2025 | Must include starting salary range or fixed pay rate in all job postings. Must include a general description of all benefits and other compensation. Salary history inquiry banned (effective Jan 1, 2024). Enforced by MN Department of Labor and Industry and the Attorney General. | Private and city employers with 30+ employees in MN | |
Oct 1, 2021 | Must disclose wage and salary expectations to any applicant who has completed an interview. Must disclose salary range to current employees who apply for, interview for, or receive an offer for a new position or promotion. Salary history inquiry banned. | All employers and employment agencies in NV (no size threshold) | |
Jun 1, 2025 | Must include wage ranges and general description of benefits in all job postings. Must make reasonable efforts to inform current employees of internal promotion opportunities. Active enforcement and audits in 2026. Penalties: Up to $600 per violation. | Employers with 10+ employees operating over 20+ calendar weeks who do business, employ persons, or accept applications in NJ | |
Sep 17, 2023 | Must disclose salary ranges in all job postings for positions performed in NY, or reporting to a NY supervisor or worksite. Must include a job description if one exists. Salary history inquiry banned. Penalties: Up to $1,000 (first), $2,000 (second), $3,000 (subsequent). Active enforcement significantly ramped up in 2024–2025. | All private NY employers with 4+ employees | |
Oregon | Jan 1, 2026 | Must provide detailed pay stubs showing all earnings and deductions, including the purpose of each deduction. Give new hires a written explanation (at hire time) that explains the company's pay schedule; all types of pay the employee might earn; all possible deductions and benefits; what each payroll code means. May only deduct from wages if the law requires it, the employee agrees in writing, or a union agreement allows it. | Employers operating in Oregon who employ one or more people during any calendar month (excluding the federal government and its agencies) |
Jan 1, 2023; updated Jan 1, 2026 | Must disclose wage range to applicants upon request, and before discussing compensation. Must disclose wage range to employees at time of hire, upon position change, and upon request. Salary history inquiry banned. 2026 update: Written new-hire notice (pay rate, schedule, deductions, employment status) is now required for all new employees. Civil penalties: $1,000–$5,000 per violation; private right of action (up to $10,000 special damages). | All employers in RI (no minimum size threshold) — universal coverage | |
Jul 1, 2025 | Must disclose actual wage or good-faith minimum-to-maximum range in all job postings (new hires and internal promotions). Commission-based postings must disclose the fact of commission; tipped positions must disclose the base wage/range. Current employees may request a wage range for their position. Covers remote positions predominantly working for a VT office. Enforced by VT Attorney General. | Employers with 5+ employees total, with at least 1 based in VT | |
Jan 1, 2023; amended 2025 | Must include pay range (or fixed wage), benefits, and other compensation in all job advertisements. Must disclose pay range for internal transfers/promotions upon request. 2025 amendment: Five-business-day cure period to fix a non-compliant posting after notice, before penalties apply (through Jul 27, 2027). Penalties: $100–$5,000 per violation. | Employers with 15+ employees who do business in WA or recruit for jobs that could be filled by WA-based workers | |
Effective Sep 26, 2027 | Must include minimum-to-maximum pay range (set in good faith) in all external and internal job postings. Must include a general description of benefits and other compensation. Enforced by Delaware Dept. of Labor. | Employers with 25+ employees | |
Nov 1, 2022 | Must disclose salary ranges in all job advertisements for jobs performed in NYC. First violation: no fine if remedied within 30 days; subsequent violations: up to $250,000 penalty. Operates alongside the statewide NY law. | NYC employers with 4+ employees; also applies to employment agencies | |
Sep 1, 2022 | Must publish a salary range for each new job posting. Salary history inquiry banned. | Employers with 4+ employees in Ithaca, NY | |
Apr 13, 2022 | Must post salary range on every job posting. Salary history inquiry banned. Statewide NJ law (effective Jun 1, 2025) now also applies. | Employers with 5+ employees with a principal place of business in Jersey City | |
Mar 13, 2020 | Must provide pay range upon applicant's request after a conditional employment offer. Salary history inquiry banned. Private right of action: Applicants may sue for compensatory damages and legal fees. | Employers with 15+ employees in Cincinnati | |
Jun 25, 2020 | Salary history inquiry banned; cannot use prior salary as reference for job offer. Must provide pay scale upon request after a conditional employment offer. Cannot retaliate against applicants who decline to disclose salary history. | Employers with 15+ employees in Toledo | |
Oct 27, 2025 | Must include salary range (wages, commissions, hourly pay, and other compensation) in all job postings. Salary history inquiry banned; cannot base employment decisions on salary history. Does not apply to internal transfers/promotions, rehires, or voluntary disclosures. Employers found in violation have 90 days to cure before civil penalties apply. | Private employers with 15+ employees working in Cleveland; applies to City of Cleveland itself; excludes state/federal government and CBA-covered positions |
Notes: No federal pay transparency law exists as of March 2026. Remote work rules vary; if a role can be performed from a state with a transparency law, that state's pay transparency requirements may apply regardless of company headquarters location. Always consult employment counsel for jurisdiction-specific advice.
How companies can prepare for pay transparency changes
Although Congress is unlikely to adopt a similar federal law, this trend is likely to continue. Private companies can stay ahead of coming legal requirements by developing systems and documentation to help prevent salary misalignment and pay discrimination.
Salary bands and levels
Developing fixed salary bands (a compensation range) that correspond to defined levels for roles across the company can help you make fair and competitive compensation offers. A banding and leveling system prepares your company to comply with evolving compensation disclosure laws: Your bands will confine pay negotiations to a fixed range that you can publish in your job listings. This transparency can prevent discrimination claims by codifying your company’s pay practices in written documentation.
Compensation philosophy and plan
A compensation philosophy documents your compensation strategy; it should go hand-in-hand with your overall business strategy by identifying your target labor market, how competitive you plan to be with salary, your approach to incentives, and your views on pay.
Establishing a strong compensation philosophy is the first step to creating a compensation plan, which also outlines your company’s job architecture (roles and levels), your approach to performance management, and the structure of compensation-based incentives. Comp plans can help cultivate pay equity through transparency, and can help you win top talent by establishing a clear framework for promotions.
If you don’t develop coherent systems for compensation decisions, you may find yourself faced with unexpected legal scrutiny. You might also lay yourself open to claims of discrimination—especially as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the federal agency that enforces fair employment laws, becomes more active in employer oversight. In addition, your company could see a leap in compliance costs if your local or state government joins the movement toward greater transparency.
To avoid these costly problems—and to help keep your hiring and recruiting efficient and competitive—you’ll want to remain up to date on legal requirements and industry best compensation practices in pay transparency.

Common pay transparency pitfalls
While the goal of pay transparency is to build trust, common mistakes can have the opposite effect. As a founder, being aware of these pitfalls can help you navigate the process more effectively and avoid unintentionally creating confusion or frustration.
Inconsistent ranges: One of the most common mistakes is posting job descriptions with overly wide or meaningless salary ranges. This can erode trust before a candidate even applies, as it suggests a lack of a clear compensation structure and can feel like a bait-and-switch.
One-off exceptions: The temptation to make a special deal for a star candidate is strong, but it undermines the entire framework of transparency. When you make one-off exceptions, you create the very inequity you are trying to avoid and risk damaging morale, especially since a majority of women already believe that employers treat women differently—a perception that special deals will only confirm.
Poorly explained equity: Offering equity without clearly explaining its value or its potential can lead to confusion and disappointment. In Q4 2024, startup employees exercised just 32.2% of vested, in-the-money grants.
Tools for a transparent compensation
As a founder, you have a choice: manage compensation the old way with spreadsheets or adopt a modern, professional approach with an integrated platform. While spreadsheets might seem sufficient at first, they quickly become a liability, introducing risks that can cost you time, money, and trust.
An integrated compensation management platform is designed to solve these problems. Carta provides the tools you need by connecting your cap table, 409A valuation report, and compensation data in one place. This creates a single, trusted system for managing compliance with Accounting Standards Codification 718 (ASC 718) and communicating total rewards, giving you the confidence to build your team and scale your business.
To see how an integrated platform can help you attract and retain top talent, request a demo.

Frequently asked questions about pay transparency
How does pay transparency apply to contractors and advisors?
While most laws focus on employees, understanding why contractors deserve equity and applying the same principles of clarity to contractor rates and Rule 701 disclosures for advisory shares builds professionalism and trust with everyone who contributes to your company.
How do you manage pay transparency for a remote team?
The best practice is to adopt a single, national approach to pay transparency, establishing a clear geographic pay policy and using a data tool like Carta Total Compensation to apply it consistently for all employees.
Does pay transparency mean sharing everyone’s exact salary?
No, for most companies, it means sharing the compensation framework and the pay bands for each role, not individual paychecks, to show employees that the system is logical and fair.
Do pay transparency laws apply to bonuses and equity?
Most laws focus on base salary or hourly wages, but some require a general description of other compensation like bonuses and phantom equity. You should always check the specific law regarding profits interest in your hiring jurisdiction to be sure.
Do these laws apply to internal promotions or transfers?
Yes, many pay transparency laws require you to provide pay range information to current employees who are moving into new roles or receiving an equity refresh grant. This reinforces the need for consistent and well-defined internal pay bands.
What is a "good faith" salary range?
A "good faith" range is the salary you genuinely believe you would pay for a role at the time of posting. It should be based on your budget and market data, not an arbitrarily wide range designed to circumvent the law or complicate a cashless exercise.
What are the penalties under pay transparency laws?
Penalties vary by state but can include significant fines for each violation. Non-compliance can create substantial financial and reputational risk, similar to failing valuations audits, making it crucial to prioritize.
DISCLOSURE: This communication is on behalf of eShares, Inc. dba Carta, Inc. ("Carta"). This communication is for informational purposes only, and contains general information only. Carta is not, by means of this communication, rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or other professional advice or services. This publication is not a substitute for such professional advice or services nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business or interests. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your business or interests, you should consult a qualified professional advisor. This communication is not intended as a recommendation, offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security. Carta does not assume any liability for reliance on the information provided herein. ©2026 Carta. All rights reserved. Reproduction prohibited.




